SafeMoon receives a strong long-term technical score of 78 from InvestorsObserver‘s research based on historical trading patterns. The proprietary scoring system weighs price movement from recent months to a year, analyzes the token’s support and resistance levels, and where it is relative to long-term averages to determine whether it’s a strong buy-and-hold investment opportunity.
SAFEMOON currently holds a superior long-term technical analysis score than 78% of cryptos in circulation. This ranking metric is most useful to buy-and-hold type investors looking for strong steady growth when allocating their assets. tokens with a high long and short-term technical score can help indicate assets that have bottomed out, providing investors a chance to ‘buy the dip’.
SAFEMOON is currently -$0.0000001 (-92.98%) below its 100-day moving average price of $0.000000075 with its current price of $0.000000005. Meanwhile, SafeMoon is $0.0000000 (-337682911096.90%) above its 52-week low price of $0.000000003 and -$0.00000516 (-193611883.89%) below its 52-week high of $0.000005165. The current price relative to its moving average and 52-week high and low leads to a strong long-term technical score of 78. Trends for the long-term trading history of SafeMoon suggest that traders are currently neutral on the token.
SafeMoon currently has a total market cap of $2,959,778.97 to go along with its average daily volume of $389.04 worth of the currency over the past seven days. SAFEMOON’s volume is below its seven day average as of the past 24 hours, with 56.49 exchanged in that period.
SAFEMOON’s historical trading over the past year gives it a a strong long-term technical score of 78 as its price movement in that time has given investors reason to be neutral on the token in the long-term.
Click Here to get the full Report on SafeMoon (SAFEMOON).
Stay In The Know
Subscribe to our daily morning update newsletter and never miss out on the need-to-know market news, movements, and more.
This news is republished from another source. You can check the original article here