SafeMoon receives an average long-term technical score of 56 from InvestorsObserver analysis. Our proprietary scoring system considers the trading patterns over the past several months to a year by analyzing the token’s consistency, volatility, and where it is relative to long-term averages to determine whether it’s a strong buy-and-hold investment opportunity.
Currently, SAFEMOON holds a superior long-term technical analysis score than 56% of crytpocurrencies. Long-term investors employing a buy-and-hold strategy will find the Long-Term Rank especially relevant when allocating their assets and may find additional value finding cyptos with a high short-term technical score to discover tokens that have bottomed out.
SafeMoon’s price is $0.0000002 (105.95%) above its 100-day moving average price of $0.000000193 as its price at the moment sits at $0.000000398. Additionally, SAFEMOON is $0.0000004 (-337682899050.95%) higher than its 52-week low price of $0.000000003 while -$0.00000614 (-152907277.57%) under its 52-week high of $0.000006540. The current trading price in relation to its long-term average along with its 52-week high and low, gives SAFEMOON an average long-term technical score of 56. Long-term trading movement of SafeMoon suggest that investors are neutral on the token at the moment.
SafeMoon has a total market value of $223,510,952.63 with an average average daily volume of $162,912.01 worth of the currency exchanged over a typical 24 hour period. As of the past 24 hours, SAFEMOON’s volume is below its average with $25,095.41 exchanged in total.
SAFEMOON’s historical trading over the past year gives it a an average long-term technical score of 56 as its price movement in that time has given investors reason to be neutral on the token in the long-term.
Click Here to get the full Report on SafeMoon (SAFEMOON).
Stay In The Know
Subscribe to our daily morning update newsletter and never miss out on the need-to-know market news, movements, and more.
This news is republished from another source. You can check the original article here